Fill in the gaps. use somebody , anybody , anywhere, nothing, anything, somewhere. 1. where does he live? - i think he lives near the supermarket. 2 .it's dark. i can't see . 3. do we have in the fridge? - yes, a few things. 4. do you know from america. 5 do you know about shakespeare. 6. don't ask her. she knows about it. 7. sssh! i can't hear . 8. is coming! - who is it? 9. do you see my keys - no, i can't find them.

1. where does he live? - i think he lives somewhere near the supermarket. 2 . it's dark. i can't see anything. 3. do we have anything in the fridge? - yes, a few things. 4. do you know anybody from america? 5  do you know anything about shakespeare? 6. don't ask her. she knows nothing about it. 7. sssh! i can't hear anything. 8. somebody is coming! - who is it? 9. do you see my keys anywhere? - no, i can't find them. 

Harm or benefit. the problem of "relationship" of children and computers discussed ever since, when the latter began to appear only in homes. evolution of opinions on this issue were held on the categorical prohibition to an unlimited permit.i believe that the computer is a health hazard. eyesight deteriorates, posture.  как-то так: ) польза -  benefit from the computer is the information, communication with friends.therefore, the computer useful, but at the same time harmful  всё что знал то и

    конструкция  there was/were  переводится в прошедшем времени обозначает "там было", "имелось". при этом порядок слов в предложениях с этой конструкцией, включая обстоятельство места, сохраняется таким же, как и в предложениях с этой конструкцией в  настоящем времени(there is/are).  was  и  were  ставятся соответственно единственному (there was) или множественному (there were) числу слова, следующего за конструкцией: there was a book on the shelf. на полке была книга. there were no books on the shelf. на полке не было книг. данная конструкция, независимо от времени, акцентирует внимание на том, что и в каком количестве находится в том или ином месте.