Мистеру гринвуду составить вопросы из слов. 1)go, where, do, in, you, the, morning,

Where do you goin tht morning

  where do you go in the morning.

1) unfortunately, man is imperfect, so their life needs coming from outside the prohibitions and their sometimes needs to supplement power. (2) these are the laws of the state authorities, such an unwritten laws of the society. (3) such laws can be successfully regulate the external life of the person. (4) but there are areas where direct intervention does not achieve the goal, where violence is always useless and harmful. (5) internal beliefs of people, the love, the belief in god is not created by the orders and prohibitions. (6) the requirements of the state and society always наплывают, looming on the person, so say, "from above". (7) but if these requirements relate not external affairs order and violate internal, living borders of the human soul, the soul responds normally resistance, indignation or even worse, bitterly, stubbornness and hatred. (8) then a person begins to cry out to his freedom, he refers to their inherent rights and fights for them, even if the orders and prohibitions contain obvious benefits for the truth. (9) such orders and prohibitions, even if their pay to the people in the best ways can force in response only external, hypocritical subordination and hypocritical love imposed values. (10) all pressures reach here only that respect, love die in the soul of man, and the means to implement them is senseless and immoral. (11) it happens: man, realizing the good orientation orders, but the soul not agreeing with them, trying to follow them. (12) without loving, pretending to be loving, not believing simulates faith. (13) and sometimes such insincere exercise lead to a number of useful actions that are produced, for example, in the so-called "public charities". (14) however, whether they can benefit the soul, internally resisting violence? 15) never has any one person could not, and neither one will not be able to love on the basis of the order or eradicate faith on the basis of the ban. (16) the divine fire in man which is in him love, believe and creates cannot be arbitrarily lit, nor arbitrarily repaid. (17) all that you can reach directly, and then only because of human weakness and timidity, is притворяющегося humility, a man who lies consent.

We live at the beginning of the xxi century. it's not surprising that people have questions: what will it be like? what awaits humanity ahead? and it would not hurt to ask what the future of humanity will be like, for everything that happens around is the work of people. so, our future depends on ourselves. to be honest, i do not have very optimistic views on the future. it seems to me that the more a person knows, the worse it becomes. we feel like kings of nature, and nature avenges us for it. we believe that we can change the geography of the world: there the sea is dormant, there we will create it. but when this was done, did anyone think about the consequences of this? we discover new and new substances, and in the end it turns out that they threaten all of humanity. we pretend that we are fighting for human rights or state rights, but in fact we are waging normal wars. this was in the xx century. will anything change in the xxi? i doubt it. what kind of person will be the future? he will be intelligent, and too smart. but it will not be her own mind, it will be the mind of the computers that he creates. why keep in mind a lot of formulas, schemes, etc? it is enough to create the program, and let the machine work further. so it will be 10, 20, 30 years, and the next generation will remember something, if they are all done by computers? the man of the future will conquer the cosmos. but i do not think that it will benefit anyone. we are gradually destroying our planet, and so are other planets. we will have a completely different culture and other art, because our society will be technical. rural landscapes will replace cities that will all grow and grow. artists will draw rockets, crowded streets and the inhabited moon. poets glorify scientific achievements and at the same time mourn for lost tranquility, because there is still the second side of the matter: people are so carried away by the creation of a new life that they forget that there are real friends, that the most important for a person is the family and that in the end is more attractive from the noise of the city is the singing of the nightingale. we are already forgetting this, and the man of the future, even more so. but still it would be interesting to live in this future. humanity, even feeling the danger ahead, will still approach it, because such is the nature of man: he always seeks to learn something, to discover, to subdue. therefore, in essence the person of the future will not differ in anything from a person of the past or the present.