Перевести: the us government consists of three main branches. the first branch is the congress. the congress is divided into two parts the senate and the house of representatives. every state no matter how large or small sends two people to senate. these people are called sanators inthe senate. a senator's term is six years. each state also sends people to the house of representatives. they are called congressmen or congresswomen. the number of congresmen from each state depends on the number of people who live in the state. the larger states have more congressmen. all in all there are 435 congressmen in the house of representatives. a representatives term is two years. the congress has the power to make laws. the second branch of government is the president and his helpers. the vice president and members of the cabinet help the president to carry out the laws that the congress makes. the us president is the commander-in-chief of the country's armed forces. the president's term is 4 years. americans vote for the president in nivember of every leap year.

Правительство США состоит из трех основных ветвей. Первое отделение-Конгресс. Конгресс разделен на две части Сенатом и Палатой представителей. Каждое государство независимо от того, насколько большой или маленький посылает двух человек в Сенат. Эти люди называются санаторами в Сенате. Срок полномочий сенатора-шесть лет. Каждое государство посылает людей в палату представителей. Они называются конгрессменами или женщины. Количество конгрессменов от каждого государства зависит от количества людей, которые живут в государстве. У крупных государств больше конгрессменов. Всего в Палате представителей 435 конгрессменов. Срок полномочий представителей составляет два года. Конгресс имеет право принимать законы. Вторая ветвь власти-Президент и его Вице-президент и члены Кабмина президенту выполнять законы, которые принимает Конгресс. Президент США-главнокомандующий вооруженными силами страны. Срок полномочий Президента - 4 года. Американцы голосуют за Президента в ноября каждого високосного года.

I came across this film by chance and it instantly won my heart!
Have you ever imagined a PERFECT screen version of a play or a literary work? I didn't, but I think I found it.

The film is black and white and, to my shame, in my experience is not that much old black and white paintings, but after the "Pygmalion" I'm sure they will be more.

This film is addictive from the first minute, including his "background" work on embroidery, I'm in a few seconds "drawn" and threw a Hoop on an hour and a half of watching the film.

And I'm not kidding it really captivated me from the first seconds. From the very beginning of the film adaptation for some reason there was a feeling-it is necessary to look. The frame was replaced by the frame, and I had a feeling: "everything is so calculated That you can not miss even a second, all the fun is lost."
The film, where there is no excess dialogue or there is a frame, it is necessary to watch everything and even to revise, purely for the aesthetic pleasure.
Wendy Hiller, about Wendy Hiller, when I saw she was in shock, thinking, " This is our heroine? She was chosen by George Bernard Shaw"?
I was not pushed away by her appearance, I was pushed away by her image, manner, but soon I realized that everything is right, I feel it. I saw her flower girl and believed her, watched her gradual changes and believed them, contemplated the beautiful Duchess and believed, felt, understood! I have a new favorite of the world of cinema!

Well, Leslie Howard wins, of course, no less. Describe his manner in the film can be only two words - rudeness and elegance. What kind of cocktail do you have to see with your own eyes, especially Professor Higgins, for all his tactlessness, somehow manages to remain a gentleman throughout the movie! Although sometimes he me than something was reminiscent mixture of the Mad Hatter with Sherlock Holmes...

I came across this film by chance and it instantly won my heart!
Have you ever imagined a PERFECT screen version of a play or a literary work? I didn't, but I think I found it.

The film is black and white and, to my shame, in my experience is not that much old black and white paintings, but after the "Pygmalion" I'm sure they will be more.

This film is addictive from the first minute, including his "background" work on embroidery, I'm in a few seconds "drawn" and threw a Hoop on an hour and a half of watching the film.

And I'm not kidding it really captivated me from the first seconds. From the very beginning of the film adaptation for some reason there was a feeling-it is necessary to look. The frame was replaced by the frame, and I had a feeling: "everything is so calculated That you can not miss even a second, all the fun is lost."
The film, where there is no excess dialogue or there is a frame, it is necessary to watch everything and even to revise, purely for the aesthetic pleasure.
Wendy Hiller, about Wendy Hiller, when I saw she was in shock, thinking, " This is our heroine? She was chosen by George Bernard Shaw"?
I was not pushed away by her appearance, I was pushed away by her image, manner, but soon I realized that everything is right, I feel it. I saw her flower girl and believed her, watched her gradual changes and believed them, contemplated the beautiful Duchess and believed, felt, understood! I have a new favorite of the world of cinema!

Well, Leslie Howard wins, of course, no less. Describe his manner in the film can be only two words - rudeness and elegance. What kind of cocktail do you have to see with your own eyes, especially Professor Higgins, for all his tactlessness, somehow manages to remain a gentleman throughout the movie! Although sometimes he me than something was reminiscent mixture of the Mad Hatter with Sherlock Holmes...