Scan the article and find answers for the questions. 1. how many earth’s resources do people consume nowadays? what are they? 2. what is the result of this consumption? 3. what are the most reasonable ways of solving the problem of ravening resources? earth suffers as we gobble up resources almost one-quarter of nature's resources are being gobbled up by a single species, and it's not difficult to guess which one. based on figures for the year 2000, the most recent available, humans appropriate 24 per cent of the earth's production capacity that would otherwise have gone to nature. the result is a gradual depletion of species and habitats as we take more of their resources for ourselves. things could get even worse if we grow more plants like palm oil and rapeseed for biofuels to ease our reliance on fossil fuels. that is the message from a team led by helmut haberl of klagenfurt university in vienna, austria. haberl and colleagues analysed un food and agriculture organization data on agricultural land use in 161 countries covering 97, 4 per cent of farmland. by comparing carbon consumption through human activity with the amount of carbon consumed overall, haberl's team found that humans use some 15.6 trillion kilograms of carbon annually. half was soaked up by growing crops. another 7 per cent went up in smoke as fires lit by humans, and the rest was used up in a variety of other ways "things could get even worse if we grow more plants like palm oil and rapeseed for biofuels to ease our reliance on fossil fuels" related to industrialisation, such as transport [proceedings of the national academy of sciences]. haberl says that the earth can just about cope if we meet future needs by producing food more efficiently. this could be done by intensifying agriculture on roughly the same amount of land as we use now. but we're asking for trouble, he says, if we expand production of biofuels, as the only fertile land available is tropical rainforests. "if we want full-scale replacement of fossil fuels by biofuels, this would have dramatic implications for ecosystems, " says haberl. he warns that some projections foresee four or fivefold increases in biofuel production. "this would at least double the overall amount of biomass harvested, which is about 30 per cent above ground at present, but would increase to 40 or 50 per cent to meet these biofuel targets, " he says. this would mean clearing what remains of the world's rainforests in countries such as brazil and argentina. as well as wiping out thousands of species, this would have devastating effects on the climate, he says. unlike farmland, forests help to seed rainfall because they have high evaporation rates. "the less evaporation there is, the less rainfall there is and the whole system dries up, " he says. andy coghlan

Отсканируйте статью и найдите ответы на вопросы.1. Сколько ресурсов Земли люди потребляют в настоящее время? Каковы они?2. Каков результат такого потребления?3. Каковы наиболее разумные решения проблемы хищения ресурсов?Земля страдает, когда мы пожираем ресурсыПочти четверть природных ресурсов поглощается одним видом, и нетрудно догадаться, какой из них. На основе данных за 2000 год, самый последний из имеющихся в наличии, люди выделяют 24 процента производственных мощностей земли, которые в противном случае пошли бы на природу.Результатом является постепенное истощение видов и местообитаний по мере того, как мы забираем больше их ресурсов для себя. Вещи могли бы стать еще хуже, если мы выращиваем больше растений, таких как пальмовое масло и рапс для биотоплива, чтобы облегчить нашу зависимость от ископаемого топлива.Это послание от группы, возглавляемой Гельмут Хаберль университета Клагенфурт в Вена, Австрия. Haberl и его коллеги проанализировали данные продовольственной и сельскохозяйственной организации ООН об использовании сельскохозяйственных земель в 161 стране, охватывающей 97,4% сельскохозяйственных угодий. Сравнивая потребление углерода через деятельность человека с количеством потребленного углерода в целом, команда Хаберла обнаружила, что люди используют около 15,6 триллионов килограммов углерода в год. Половина была пропитана растениями. Еще 7 процентов возросло в дыму из-за пожаров, освещаемых людьми, а остальные были использованы в различных других формах: "ситуация может ухудшиться, если мы будем выращивать больше растений, таких как пальмовое масло и рапс, для биотоплива, чтобы облегчить нашу зависимость от ископаемых видов топлива", связанных с индустриализацией, таких как транспорт [труды Национальной Академии наук].Хаберль говорит, что Земля может почти справиться, если мы удовлетворяем будущие потребности, производя пищу более эффективно. Это можно было бы сделать путем интенсификации сельского хозяйства на тех же землях, что и сейчас. Но мы просим неприятностей, говорит он, если мы расширяем производство биотоплива, так как единственная плодородная земля, доступная, - это тропические тропические леса."Если мы хотим полномасштабной замены ископаемого топлива биотопливом, это будет иметь серьезные последствия для экосистем", - говорит Хаберль. Он предупреждает, что некоторые прогнозы предусматривают четырехкратное или пятикратное увеличение производства биотоплива. "Это, по крайней мере, удвоит общий объем заготовленной биомассы, которая в настоящее время находится на уровне 30 процентов над землей, но увеличится до 40 или 50 процентов для достижения этих целевых показателей в области биотоплива", - говорит он.Это будет означать очистку того, что осталось от мировых тропических лесов в таких странах, как Бразилия и Аргентина. А также уничтожение тысяч видов, это будет иметь разрушительные последствия для климата, говорит он. В отличие от сельскохозяйственных угодий, леса осеменять осадки, потому что они имеют высокую скорость испарения."Чем меньше испарений, тем меньше осадков выпадает и вся система высыхает", - говорит он. Энди Коглан

english the beginning of the year. In the past, in every country, when March was born, people used to go from village to village, from house to house, drinking soup, and enjoying each other's company. At the same time, it seems that he is living among the Kazakhs, and there are different opinions about the month and day of March. Some say that March comes on March 1, others on March 9, and everyone celebrates the New Year every day, when the old year is over and the new year begins: "May the new year be good, may the new happiness be a profession", he celebrates the day with joy. The New Year of Rust comes in the middle of winter, in the freezing cold, and our New Year - Nauryz, whether in early or mid-March, or in March, deserves to be called the New Year. It's time for the sun to warm up, the snow to melt, and the animals to feel the summer approaching. It's time for the peasants to rest on their laurels, bringing their ditches, which they have been feeding for six months. It is a time when trees and grass are shaking out from under the snow, preparing to blossom, the sun rises in the winter, shines on the whole world, balances the homeless with the home, and gives light to the rich and the poor. It would be nice if our New Year, Nauryz, was born in such a fun time of nature, and we would not forget our traditions and start a certain day.

Let people who know about it write to "Kazakh" that our New Year - Nauryz - clearly begins in which month and day of the year. We apologize for not being able to know the exact day of March to congratulate our students on the New Year

Объяснение:

Наверное правильно и я вам Если правильно то можно ЛУЧШИЙ ОТВЕТ.

Writing "Clean City" What do to in our city has always reigned purity? To not lay around cigarette butts, candy wrappers, plastic packaging? And the residents did not breathe in smoke and dust? I think that for the cleanliness of the city and so much done. For example, the streets are covered with asphalt, that there is no dirt. Every morning, go to work janitors, sweeping the streets, courtyards and alleys vapor. Then take out garbage rubbish from each container. Can you imagine what it would be if all this is not done? City would simply drowned in the fallen leaves, bottles, wrappers, broken things, cleaning the kitchen and other waste! Another thing is that the wipers try and add them to other citizens work, throw garbage anywhere, past the urns. And if everyone stops to throw cigarette butts on the pavement, on the lawn throwing empty packages, "hide" in the bushes of the bottle, then the city would be clean. As if by magic! But it must act every resident of the city. Do not put the blame on each other and say, "Why me! Let neighbor takes care of cleanliness! ". We need to do their own rule of cleanliness, not only at home but also in the city. I think that if every citizen is to think about the environment, there will be no city garbage. And the streets are clean. And also be able to solve other environmental problems of the city. For example, it will not smoke from the factory chimneys and car exhausts air pollutants in the city. Or wastewater from factories that poison the river city so that they can not swim citizens. The main thing - do not be indifferent, and do what you can.