поменять предложение, но чтобы остался смысл. Слово которое в кавычках надо использовать + еще какие то слова. 1. It is the first time she has ever had problems with the authorities. ''trouble " She with the authorities before. 2. I have nor caught a cold for ages. "down" I last ages ago.

1has never been in trouble 2... went down with a cold

Rahul wins National Spelling Bee For the past five years the Hathwar family have travelled to Washington DC to watch their children in the top US spelling competition, the National Spelling Bee. Their elder daughter, Gayathri, (take) 0 has taken part since she was nine years old, and her younger brother Rahul (has just won) the first prize of $40,000 at his first attempt. Rahul and Gayathri (had been studying) hard to reach the final, which was shown on television all over the US. Mr.Hathwar helped his children beforehand by making lists of words and checking their meaning. He was confident they (would do) well. Rahul even (stopped) playing computer games and doing his other hobbies to concentrate on learning spellings. “I (don't regret) it,” he says. “The Spelling Bee (has taught) me to work hard. I (didn't expect) to come first so I was amazed at the result. I was so anxious when I arrived at the Television Centre I (couldn't) stop shaking.” Gayathri admitted she was a little disappointed that she (has never become или еще модет быть had never become) a winner. But now she (is) very proud of her brother’s success.

1. The three phases of investigation aren't separated by the lawyers in time.

2. The criminal has been identified by the witnesses as the perpetrator of the

criminal acts.

3. The identity of the criminal was discovered by some circumstantial evidence and the eyewitness testimony.

4.By the beginning of the trial sufficient evidence for court has been gathered.

5. Some additional evidence was obtained which helped locate and identify the perpetrator.

6. The fugitive who was hiding was traced.

7. The fact of the existence of the crime was established by the court.

8. The witnesses were competent. Sufficient physical evidence which showed the connection of the criminal with the offense was presented.