II. Complete with correct relative pronoun. 1. I talked to a boy ... had that awful big dog.2. Mrs. Martin, is a shop assistant, asked me to paint her house in blue.3. That is the shop - I bought my new trainers4. Jessica, ... car you can see over there, is the rudest girl in the world.​

1.who

2. who

3. where

4. that in

“Who” refers to people

“Where” refers to places

“That” refers to people, things, and animals (who and which can be replaced by that, which we use commonly in spoken English)

1. By two o'clock the teacher had examined all the students.

2. On my way to school I remembered that I left my report at home.

3. All my friends were glad to hear that I had passed all the examina­tions successfully.

4. Poor Oliver lay unconscious on the spot where Sikes left him.

5. He opened his eyes, looked around and tried to re­member what had happened to him.

6. All the passen­gers saw at once that the old man had travelled a great deal in his life.

7. By the time we came to see him, he had returned home.

8. During the holi­days my friend visited the village where he had lived in his childhood.

9. When they entered the hall, the performance already had begun.

10. When I came home, my mother told me that she had received a letter from grandfather.

11. Where had you worked before you entered the institute?

12. He had studied French before he entered the university.

13. Lanny said that he had got his education in Cape Town.

14. The boy wanted to act the main part in the play because he had organized the theatre.

15. Lanny didn't know who had attacked him in the darkness.

16. The girl was glad that she had found a seat near the win­dow.

17. Suddenly he remembered that he hadn't rung her up in the morning.

18. By the time the train reached the city, he had made friends with many passengers.

19. When my uncle left, he hurried to the station to book a ticket.

20. She thought that Ann and Lanny had quarreled.

Pallas’s Cat has a wide but fragmented distribution in the grasslands and montane steppe of Central Asia. Even in optimal steppe habitat in Mongolia Pallas’s Cats occur at a very low density of two to six Pallas’s Cats/100 km2 (Ross in prep.). Their low density is believed to be a result of interspecific predation which restricts their use of habitats to those with good cover from predators, whilst maintaining access to prey. A consequence of habitat specialization is that a low percentage of the landscape is suitable for their needs, and their low density means that relatively large areas are required for conservation of viable populations (Ross et al. 2012). Pallas’s Cats are dependent on marmot burrows or other available cavities to provide dens for daily use and rearing young, which further restricts habitat availability (Ross et al. 2010a). Using the Pallas’s Cat studbook data (Barclay 2013) generation length has been estimated at 3.61 years. However, most populations now experience disturbances resulting in reduced lifespan and lower reproductive output (e.g. Ross 2009). Predation by sympatric carnivores, domestic dogs and human offtake are the main causes of mortality (Ross 2009). While recent records have resulted in small expansions of the species known range, increases in the number and extent of livestock, herders and herding dogs is resulting in increased habitat degradation, displacement and mortalities (Damdinsuren et al. 2008, Barashkova and Smelansky 2011, Ross et al. 2012). Mineral exploitation and infrastructure developments have also increased substantially in Central Asia increasing fragmentation throughout its core range (Selles 2013). Pallas’s Cat continues to be at serious risk from a declining prey base due to pika and rodent control programmes and secondary poisoning. A lack of range-wide data means there is little empirical bases on which to estimate population size and status of Pallas’s Cat. However, based on low detection rates, increases in habitat degradation and the species biological susceptibility to disturbance, populations are suspected to be fragmented and to have declined by 10–15% over the past 11 years (three generations). The species is listed as Near Threatened as it may qualify as Vulnerable under criterion C1 in the future when the population size drops below 10,000 mature individuals (it is currently about 15,000).