Ix. составьте предложения no следующим образцам, используя данные слова и словосочетания. образцы: 1. he’s supposed to come to see us to morrow. 2. he was supposed to be here in the eve ning, wasn’t he? 3. she wasn’t supposed to know about it. 4. who was supposed to do it? 5. people aren’t supposed to smoke here. to produce a ticket; to lend books (money, skis, skates); to stay with smb.; to arrive at a hotel (at a station, port); to introduce smb. to smb.; to give a talk on smth.; to see smb. home; to accompany smb. to the theatre; to look after the matter (children); to look through the letters (articles)

1. he's supposed to   produce a ticket tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to produce a ticket in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to produce a ticket. 4. who was supposed to produce a ticket? 5. people aren't supposed to produe a ticket. 1. he's supposed to  lend books (money, skis, skates)  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  lend books (money, skis, skates)in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to  lend books (money, skis, skates). 4. who was supposed to  lend books (money, skis, skates)? 5. people aren't supposed to  lend books (money, skis, skates). 1. he's supposed to  stay with smb  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  stay with smb  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to  stay with smb. 4. who was supposed to  stay with smb? 5. people aren't supposed to  stay with smb. 1. he's supposed to  arrive at a hotel (at a station, port)  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  arrive at a hotel (at a station, port)  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to  arrive at a hotel (at a station, port). 4. who was supposed to  arrive at a hotel (at a station, port)? 5. people aren't supposed to  arrive at a hotel (at a station, port). 1. he's supposed to  introduce smb. to smb  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  introduce smb. to smb  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to  introduce smb. to smb. 4. who was supposed to  introduce smb. to smb? 5. people aren't supposed to  introduce smb. to smb. 1. he's supposed to  give a talk on smth  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  give a talk on smth  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to  give a talk on smth. 4. who was supposed to    give a talk on smth? 5. people aren't supposed to    give a talk on smth. 1. he's supposed to    see smb. home  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  see smb. home  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to    see smb. home. 4. who was supposed to     see smb. home? 5. people aren't supposed to    see smb. home. 1. he's supposed to    see smb. home  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  see smb. home  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to    see smb. home. 4. who was supposed to     see smb. home? 5. people aren't supposed to    see smb. home. 1. he's supposed to  accompany smb. to the theatre  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  accompany smb. to the theatre  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to  accompany smb. to the theatre. 4. who was supposed to   accompany smb. to the theatre? 5. people aren't supposed to   accompany smb. to the theatre. 1. he's supposed to    look after the matter (children)  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to    look after the matter (children)  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to    look after the matter (children). 4. who was supposed to    look after the matter (children)? 5. people aren't supposed to   look after the matter (children) 1. he's supposed to  look through the letters (articles)  tomorrow. 2. he was supposed to  look through the letters (articles)  in the evening, wasn't he? 3. she wasn't supposed to  look through the letters (articles). 4. who was supposed to  look through the letters (articles)? 5. people aren't supposed to  look through the letters (articles)

1) в першому випадку артикль стоїть перед іменником в однині,в другому випадку артикль стоїть через  слово "червоний".адже коли перед іменником (олівець) стоїть прикметник -   артикль необхідний. в третьому випадку артикль стоїть після прийменника,а після нього завжди необхідно їх ставити. 2)в першому випадку - звична справа, коли людина розповідає про свою професію. назву необхідно вжити з артиклем,у другому випадку артикль не стоїть,тому що "my" - присвійний займенник,після або перед яким артикль не вживаєься.в треьому випадку після слів прикметників немає іменника,тому і артикля нема. 3) після "at" артикль не вживається. 4)   a black tie and   is a white tie.- прикметники перед іменником,тому і ставимо,адже це як характеристика.5)my friend - як і було сказоно.після присвійного займенника не ставимо,  a young girl.-  прикметники перед іменником,  a first-year student - артикль після порядкового  числівника,.   on the second floor- теж  числівник, in the house - після прийменника. 6)   the most beautiful season - ступінь порівняння прикметників,

Прошлым летом джим и джилл пошли в лес. тот день был прекрасен. было жарко и солнечно.    джим и джилл шли по лесу, потом сели под большим деревом. они много о  чем разговаривали.  вдруг они увидели маленькую птицу. птица упала от дерева. джим взял  птицу в руки и дети пошли домой.они  положили  птицу в коробку.   любили эту  птицу. они давали   птице  хлеб , яблоки, кукурузу и воду.эта птица жила  в их доме в течение двух недель. потом джим и джилл взяли  птицу обратно в лес. птица была   рада.