Нужно перевести на these were the words of madonna as she walked onto the stage of the london live 8 concert. on 3rd july 2005, live 8 concerts were held in ten cities around the globe. the idea was to highlight the problem of poverty in africa. hundreds of millions of people around the world watched the concerts on their televisions. but how, did this all start? the day that rock and roll really changed the world was twenty years earlier, on 13 july 1985, and all because of one man, bob geldof. on that day more than a billion and a half people around the world united together to watch the biggest rock concert ever held - live aid. 30 million people were suffering in a terrible famine in sub-saharan africa. it was an event so completely shocking - happening on our television screens, with children dying in front of our eyes - that it moved everyone who saw it. the concert raised £140 million. live aid was a miracle - technologically, emotionally and politically. it is difficult now to understand what an amazing achievement it was to broadcast the first live, all-day, multi-artist concert to the whole world. in 1985 there were no mobile phones and hardly any fax machines. in many countries international phone calls usually had to be booked, sometimes hours in advance. computers were outside the experience of most ordinary people. email was a future dream. yet surprisingly, simultaneous concerts on two continents were co-ordinated. global television schedules were cleared. concorde was put on stand-by. even the space shuttle astronauts lined up to make a contribution. live aid started new ways of thinking and behaving - in broadcasting, in putting political pressure on governments and in raising money. nowadays, these have become normal as more and more charities regularly use music as an instrument for change. bob geldof, the organiser of live aid and live 8, saw an opportunity. he wanted to make governments and people do something important to change the terrible situation. he used what he says is 'the lingua franca of the planet - not english but rock 'n' roil', and it was a fantastic success. live aid was one of the first indications that we now lived in a globalised world. interestingly, its language was music, and the message it delivered so loudly and clearly was of the need for change.

это были слова мадонны, когда она вышла на сцену концерта london live

3 июля 2005 года были проведены концерты live 8 в десяти городах мира.

идея заключалась в том, чтобы осветить проблему бедности в африке. сотни миллионов людей по всему миру смотрели концерты по телевизору. но как, все это началось?

день, когда рок-н-ролл действительно изменил мир, был двадцать лет назад, 13 июля 1985 года, и все из-за одного человека, боба гелдофа. в тот день более миллиарда с половиной человек по всему миру объединились, чтобы посмотреть самый большой рок-концерт, который когда-либо проводился - live aid.

30 миллионов человек страдали от ужасного голода в странах африки к югу от сахары. это было событие настолько шокирующее - происходящее на экранах наших телевизоров, когда дети умирали на глазах, - что это тронуло всех, кто его видел. концерт собрал 140 миллионов фунтов стерлингов.

живая была чудом - технологически, эмоционально и политически. сейчас трудно понять, каким удивительным достижением было транслировать первый живой, многодневный концерт с участием нескольких артистов для всего мира. в 1985 году не было ни мобильных телефонов, ни факсов. во многих странах международные телефонные звонки обычно приходилось бронировать, иногда за несколько часов. компьютеры были вне опыта большинства обычных людей. электронная почта была будущей мечтой.

и все же удивительно, что одновременные концерты на двух континентах были скоординированы. телевизионные графики были очищены. конкорд был переведен в режим ожидания. даже астронавты космического челнока выстроились в очередь, чтобы внести свой вклад. live aid открыла новые способы мышления и поведения - в радиовещании, оказании политического давления на правительство и в сборе денег. в настоящее время это стало нормой, поскольку все больше и больше благотворительных организаций регулярно используют музыку в качестве инструмента для перемен.

боб гелдоф, организатор live aid и live 8, увидел возможность. он хотел, чтобы правительства и люди сделали что-то важное, чтобы изменить ужасную ситуацию. он использовал то, что, по его словам, является «лингва франка планеты» - не , а рок-н-ролл, и это был фантастический успех.

живая была одним из первых признаков того, что мы теперь живем в мире. интересно, что его языком была музыка, и сообщение, которое он так громко и ясно произносил, было о необходимости перемен.

instead of havingto deal withthan themore productiveyou candevote himself torest.read the book,an intriguingtitle of whichhas long beeninterested inyou.goto the premiere ofnew movieorwatchinteresting programson tv.spend some timebehinda computer gameor invitefriendsfor a game ofmonopoly,scrabbleor any otherboard game.outsidethe weatheris good,then it's timeto gofor a walk.you can alsogoto visit friends.if you lovetaking pictures, itdoes notlooka few tips onhow to properlyphotographedand go! listento music orplayyourselfon what-or amusical instrument,of course, ifyou have thetalent andthe skills.becauseotherwise,your leisure timecan turn into ashowdownwith its neighbors.you did not knowwhat to dowhenbored? our answer is: do anything, as long asyoubroughtitfun!

in the world today there was a unique situation for the last few centuries: the modern science can not explain the realities of the current economic crisis, the features of its civilization and socio-political aspects. this is absolutely not satisfied with the society, in almost all countries, in this sense act "occupying wall street" in the u.s., in a sense, no different from our "standing in the swamp": and then, and then - there is a peace offer from the society to the elite few to change the configuration of their relationship, so to speak, "to make room on olympus," and to share resources. and just as we, the western elite meets a categorical refusal.the reasons there may be several. i think the main thing is that in the 60 - 80 years, under the "confrontation between the two systems," in the west, much weakened state and public control over its financial elite. by the reason, especially since the early 80s, when it became the main mechanism of emission of raising living standards, which eventually led to the death of the ussr and the soviet project. however, the financial elite gained at the expense of the tremendous privilege, which today it is not going to leave.moreover, in the confrontation of two systems, the west has created a language for describing the world (not only economic but also social systems, government, history, and so on and so forth), which in principle does not provide for the possibility of destruction and the end of the current system . and this is why we can not now describe the problems of our world - what good it can be seen on the results of the last davos.note that in our country, the language describing the world today there is no general. from the marxist language (which, we note a complete analogue of the western and comprehensively describe the whole world, so to speak, from the date of its creation), we refused, and the west have also not very happy, because the current russian elite and its management practices look at this language does not very nice. what, in fact, is one of the main reasons, and certainly the main reason that most of the external pressure, which is so irritating to our elites.and here in this place there is an interesting collision. but what if we try to develop a new, common language description of the new world? if this is done, the main task of our elite since the early 60s, "merge in ecstasy" with the elite of the west, to put into practice the project "convergence" will, in general, be solved. yes, with a significant portion of our current elite, as, indeed, modern western elites, in this new elite just do not go down. but those who will and will implement this project - will go for sure.in this case there are other options. for example, we develop such a language, and they - no. or vice versa. or, we develop two different languages these options can be a lot to discuss, but, in general, today formed a unique case to implement these ideas. a separate question of whether to do it, but by itself this option is expensive, especially since both us and the west likes it or not, you still have to go through a painful period of "breaking" the elites. just because the "sweet cakes again did not have enough for everyone! "